Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Law: DWI-Blood Test-Consent

Staff Report//September 18, 2019//

Criminal Law: DWI-Blood Test-Consent

Staff Report//September 18, 2019//

Listen to this article

Where a defendant in a drunk-driving case challenged the admission of her blood-test results after she tried to specify where and by whom her blood was tested, the defendant did not have the right to control the manner in which a lawfully obtained blood sample was tested, and the evidence established that she consented to the test, so the judgment is affirmed because the defendant also had no constitutional right to counsel to bring a claim for ineffective assistance.

Judgment is affirmed.

State v. Reeter (MLW No. 73913/Case No. WD81725 – 9 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Ahuja, J.) Appealed from circuit court, Livingston County, Valbracht, J. (Adam L. Warren, Chillicothe, for respondent) (Damien Bhakti De Loyola, Kansas City, Missouri, for appellant).

Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Top stories

See more news