Criminal Law: DWI-Blood Test-Consent
Staff Report//September 18, 2019//
Where a defendant in a drunk-driving case challenged the admission of her blood-test results after she tried to specify where and by whom her blood was tested, the defendant did not have the right to control the manner in which a lawfully obtained blood sample was tested, and the evidence established that she consented to the test, so the judgment is affirmed because the defendant also had no constitutional right to counsel to bring a claim for ineffective assistance.
Judgment is affirmed.
State v. Reeter (MLW No. 73913/Case No. WD81725 – 9 pages) (Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Ahuja, J.) Appealed from circuit court, Livingston County, Valbracht, J. (Adam L. Warren, Chillicothe, for respondent) (Damien Bhakti De Loyola, Kansas City, Missouri, for appellant).
Latest Opinion Digests
- Criminal Law-Second-Degree Rape-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Witness Tampering-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Abandonment by Counsel
- Criminal Law-Filing Criminal Charges-Attorney General Aid
- Criminal Law-Civil Commitment-Sexually Violent Predator
- Criminal Law-Assault-Prosecutorial Misconduct
- Real Property-Prescriptive Easement-Public Right of Way
Legal Tech
- AI in practice: How new technology is affecting litigation practice
- Experts foresee legal malpractice risk for those who eschew AI
- Legal Decoder launches AI-powered billing analytics interface
Top stories
- 8th Circuit dismisses Liberty Mutual appeal over remand order in Missouri
- Elderly couple injured in collision settles with insurer
- 8th Circuit rejects tribal school funding appeal
- 8th Circuit reverses shoreline use permit revocation
- Missouri Bar committee seeks input on rural legal service gaps
- Appeals court orders new look at conversion therapy case following Supreme Court ruling
- Jury finds seat belt maker liable in $40.5M child injury case
- Injured motorist recovers policy limits, plus medical damages in under a year





