Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Law: First-Degree Murder-Motive Evidence-Inadmissible Testimony

Staff Report//March 27, 2020//

Criminal Law: First-Degree Murder-Motive Evidence-Inadmissible Testimony

Staff Report//March 27, 2020//

Listen to this article

Where a defendant in a case challenged the exclusion of evidence that others had motives to kill the victim, the defendant did not present any evidence that would directly connect another individual to the shooting, so the trial court did not err in excluding evidence of others’ motives, and the court did not abuse its discretion in denying a request for a mistrial after a witness spontaneously offered about the defendant’s request for an attorney, and the judgment is affirmed over the defendant’s remaining claims of evidentiary error.

Judgment is affirmed.

State v. Allen (MLW No.74738/Case No. ED107222 – 20 pages) (Missouri Court  9of Appeals, Eastern District, Sullivan, J.) Appealed from circuit court, St. Louis City, Hettenbach, J. (Matthew A. Radefeld for appellant) (Daniel N. McPherson for respondent).

Legal Tech

See All Legal Tech News

Latest Opinion Digests

See all digests

Top stories

See more news