Free Newsletter
Criminal Law-Assault-Persistent Offender
Staff Report//July 1, 2026//
Defendant appealed the trial court’s judgment following his conviction for assault, which found that defendant was a persistent offender. Defendant argued that the trial court erred in making that determination instead of the jury.
Where defendant failed to show that the jury would have made a different determination as the evidence was sufficient to find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant had committed previous felonies in Missouri and Illinois, there was no prejudicial error in designating defendant a persistent offender.
Judgment is affirmed.
State v. Otis (MLW No. 85025/Case No. SC101190 – 11 pages) (Supreme Court of Missouri, Broniec, J.) Appealed from circuit court, St. Charles County, Horack, J. (Chad Flanders, St. Louis for appellant) (Garrick Aplin, Jefferson City for respondent)
Latest Opinion Digests
- Insurance-Interpleader-Competing Claims to Insurance Proceeds
- Employer-Employee-Discrimination-Hostile Work Environment
- Criminal Law-Rape-Oral and Written Judgments
- Torts-Defamation-Official Immunity
- Real Property-Adverse Possession-Oral Agreement for Sale
- Domestic Relations-Termination of Parental Rights-Parental Unfitness
- Criminal Law-Violation of Order of Protection-Scope of Cross-Examination
- Criminal Law-Resisting Arrest-Sufficiency of Evidence
- Criminal Law-Post-Conviction Relief-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Domestic Relations-Dissolution-Property Division
- Criminal Law-Assault-Self-Defense
Top stories
- AAA Insurance faces $21.5M bad faith verdict in Clay County
- Legal Limelight: Meghan S. Largent champions landowners in takings cases
- Supreme Court rejects bright-line rule on FAA worker exemption
- 2026 Unsung Legal Heroes: Publisher’s Letter, honorees
- Driver in accident settles negligence suit with other motorist
- Verdicts may fuel Missouri social media claims
- Judge Anthony Rex Gabbert retiring after 32 years
- Severe motorcycle crash nets seven-figure settlement
